#Corpse ona hole plus#

It’s not a debate they are not trying to win. Informal discussions, though, thrive through such leaps, glimpsing ideas that might otherwise remain unseen.Ĥ The dialogue is not truly dialectical in that M and L often mirror each other’s thoughts rather than representing differing perspectives. That is, it is quite difficult to leap from Mandelbrot, to Hesiod, to Cixous, to Sappho, and then to cummings without the internal structures of the formal essay collapsing.

However, formal essays also place limits and boundaries on the tangential thought that has the potential to turn the exploration toward an unseen horizon. Formal essays certainly have their place as they often serve as the impetus that spurs discussion. In order to do so, the conversation gravitates toward the seeming stillness of corpses.ģ Over the years, I have come to value informal discussions with colleagues, with students, and with strangers. This final dialogue explores the relationship, if any, between Eros and that origin. Top of pageġ This is the fourth and final dialogue between the characters “M” and “L.” In the third dialogue, the pair aims for what the title prompts, “Toward an Arboreal Poetics.” As they talk, they explore the fact that bifurcating patterns exist in the cosmos from lightning, to skeletal systems, to circulatory systems, to the tributaries and deltas of rivers, to trees, to the dendritic crystallization of snow, to the dendritic patterns of neurons, to the dendritic spirals of the Mandelbrot Set, and to the branching thought within language made manifest through the practice of diagramming sentences.Ģ However, the arc of the four dialogues keeps revisiting the question concerning the origin of poiesis and the kinship between the poiesis of the Earth and of the poem. De même qu’un cadavre se décompose, de même le sens se décompose dans la (dés)intégration des mots et des lettres d’une phrase. « Stillness, Deep Time, & the Corpse » affirme que les forces d’Éros qui rendent le pourrissement possible sont également à l’œuvre dans le langage. Même si Hésiode ne pouvait pas comprendre la physique du 21 ème siècle, il plaçait Éros comme l’un des dieux fondateurs au commencement de tout.

#Corpse ona hole plus#

(Le calme ne peut être atteint qu’au zéro absolu, la température à laquelle un électron ne bouge plus - ce qui n’est, pour l’instant, qu’un concept théorique). Ce sont des forces qui incarnent l’attraction et le désir et qui sont à l’œuvre dans chaque objet de l’univers connu. Éros est un aperçu mythologique des quatre lois fondamentales du cosmos : les forces gravitationnelles, les forces magnétiques, les forces nucléaires faibles et les forces nucléaires fortes. Qu’est-ce qui réside au cœur du mystère de l’immobilité ? La réponse tient en un mot : Éros. L’immobilité n’est alors qu’un mirage et qu’une question de perspective. D’une part, le cadavre semble totalement immobile, mais d’autre part, il est grouillant en raison du processus de décomposition. Cummings, « rien ne surpasse le mystère de l’immobilité », et en particulier dans la prétendue « immobilité » du cadavre d’un animal.

« Stillness, Deep Time, & the Corpse : An Ode to Eros » trouve son origine dans la phrase d’E. “Stillness, Deep Time, & the Corpse” argues that the forces of Eros that make decay possible are also at work within language, and just as a corpse composts, so meaning composts in the (dis)integration of the words and letters of a sentence.

(Stillness can only be achieved at absolute zero, the temperature when an electron no longer moves–which is, as of yet, only a theoretical concept.) Though Hesiod did not have an understanding of 21 st century physics, he places Eros as one of the foundational gods at the beginning of everything.

Forces that are at work within every object in the known universe. Forces that epitomize attraction and desire. Eros as a mythological insight into the four foundational laws of the cosmos: gravitational forces, electro magnetic forces, weak nuclear forces, strong nuclear forces. What, though, is at the heart the mystery of stillness ? In short, Eros. Stillness, then, becomes a mirage and a matter of perspective. From one perspective, the corpse seems absolutely still, but from another, the corpse swarms with the processes of decay. Cummings, nothing surpasses the mystery of stillness -especially the supposed “stillness” of the animal corpse. “Stillness, Deep Time, & the Corpse: An Ode to Eros” anchors its exploration in the phrase by E.